Please use your experience and judgment in evaluating this medical education Web page. Some of the criteria you may choose to employ in your evaluation are provided below. In addition, you may have evaluation criteria not explicitly indicated below that you may wish to utilize in your evaluation.
Writing
The text follows basic rules of grammar, spelling, and composition.
The writing style is appropriate to the intended audience.
Content
The purpose of the page is clear.
The information will be useful to its intended audience.
This information is not readily available elsewhere.
The information presented is accurate.
Authority
The author is clearly identified.
The author is qualified to write on the topic.
The author provides a clear way to be contacted.
Currency
The site indicates the date of the last revision.
The site has been updated recently.
Accessibility
You can connect quickly to the page.
The page is free.
The page loads quickly.
Organization
The type styles and background make the page clear and readable.
The links are easy to identify and are logically grouped.
Do all the links work?
The layout is clear and easy to follow, and is consistent from page to page.
There is a link back to the home page on each supporting page.
The site is eye-catching and engages the visitor.
Technical
HTML code is clear enough to allow hand-editing.
The use of frames is avoided.
Effective use of Web technology is demonstrated.
Works in all major browsers.
Multimedia resources work properly.
Interactivity, where appropriate, is utilized.
NOTE: This evaluation instrument is partly based on the work of the following authors:
[1] Dr. Nancy Everhart http://www.duke.edu/~de1/evaluate.html
[2] Al Rogers http://www.ux1.eiu.edu/~cfmgb/web.htm
[3] John Pilgrim
http://edtech.sandi.net/rubric/
[4] Anonymous http://www.hu.mtu.edu/teachtech/search2.htm
[5] William Trochim http://trochim.human.cornell.edu/webeval/webeval.htm
